Thursday, March 30, 2006

Color vs. Black-and-White


In finding the reference to my last blog posting, I discovered that the original photograph, taken by Frederic Larson in 1998, was in color! What a difference!! Yet, is it?

I have to admit, I like BOTH versions of this photograph. The color version shows us the sky, in a way that was not very visible in the black-and-white version. Also, we get the strong red lines mixing with the gray and white in the blanket. And we see the siding is a mottled, sandy-mud brown. Still, the boys stand out in their dark jackets. Maybe the roundness of the bedroll is a little more prominent. Other than that, it's not much different. Except for the sky. Yes, that definitely changes the picture. The sky makes the image altogether more hopeful, more positive; the boys feel safer here in a world where the sky is blue. Indeed, they ARE safe, in this rolling home-away-from-home. Transients they may be, but the edginess of their life is no longer so evident.

Hmm - maybe there's something to this black-and-white thing. It's as if the loss of color lets us look in on the view in a totally different manner. We concentrate on the essence, rather than being seduced by the eye-candy of color. Well, I'm still debating: Should I try taking more photos in black-and-white? It feels like such a LOSS to me. But when I see evidence like this, it makes me wonder. Isn't it at least worth exploring?

1 Comments:

Blogger MailLadyMartha said...

After posting this photo online, I noticed two other things. The online image lists the Chronicle's name first, and the photographer's name second. Also, the year the picture was taken is missing. Well, that's two more reasons to prefer the print, black-and-white, version...

March 30, 2006 7:17 AM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home