Thursday, November 26, 2020

Street Photography

 Recently I got a real treat - I discovered a photographer in the Bay Area who photographs like I do - or at least how I WANT to do! This photographer, Doug Kaye, has had workshops in Cuba and San Francisco in the past. But now, in an era of sheltering-in-place, he is focusing on a more virtual presentation of his style and stuff. 

 I have no idea how I discovered the Golden Gate Computer Society, but somehow I did. Fortuitously, they were offering a free virtual meeting this month in which Doug Kaye showcased his portfolio. WOW!! I was mesmerized - took lots of screenshots, and am eager now to share what I saw. Sadly, I could not stay to the end. Also, I could not figure out how to remove the Zoom icon in the upper right. That means these are not the best presentation of his photos. However, the last images indicate where he and his photographs can be found, and I've linked to his website in the first paragraph. So - here's a link to the screenshots from a presentation of Doug Kaye's work presented at the Golden Gate Computer Society (also on YouTube!) on Monday, November 23, 2020 via Zoom. Enjoy!!


Street Photography by Doug Kaye - a presentation of 138 screenshots


Read more!

Friday, September 26, 2014

Road Trip Photography

It's been such a long while since I've written on this blog, but this video is extraordinary. It combines two of my great loves - travel and photography. Can't wait to see the book itself!

The Open Road: Photography and the American Road Trip from Aperture Foundation on Vimeo.

Aperture's Fall 2014 book release, 'The Open Road: Photography and the American Road Trip' is the first book to explore the photographic road trip as a genre. It opens with a comprehensive introduction, which traces the rise of road culture in America and considers photographers on the move across the country and across the century, from the early 1900s to present day.

Here, editor Denise Wolff, author David Campany, and featured photographers Joel Meyerowitz, Justine Kurland, and Todd Hido discuss the book, and their own relationship to the the road. 'The Open Road' is a visual tour-de-force, pres­enting the story of photographers for whom the American road is muse.


Read more!

Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Visualizing Poverty

Foreign Policy had an incredible slideshow of photos by Stefen Chow, highlighting what poverty means around the world. He showcases individual items of food that cost about $1, the figure often quoted by the UN as the average income for those at the poverty line worldwide. View the slideshow from this link, and be sure to see it full-screen, so you see the titles and description:
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/02/27/the_poverty_line#0

Read more!

Monday, February 27, 2012

Rangefinder on iPhone

What an amazing idea - someone has made a rangefinder that fits over an iPhone! What will they think of next.



The iPhone Rangefinder at the Photojojo Store!

Read more!

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Marion Warling

Friend Cindy just alerted me about the death of Marion Warling, a photographer she met in the 1970's in Minneapolis. Here's a link to some photos of his, and to his obituary. He sounds like a wonderful person, and his photographs are well worth viewing. I also enjoyed seeing his grandmother's photos, showing the family farm in Norway, the marriage of his grandparents, and their homesteading in Canada. It just goes to show how photography reaches us on the inside, and reminds us all of our shared human history. Here is a photographic tribute to Marion on the the Digital Photography Sony Forum. Thanks, Cindy!

Read more!

Saturday, December 06, 2008

Photoshop Batch Processing

Basically, I'm just saving this link to pursue it at a later time. I came across a site that has this video tutorial on doing batch processing in Photoshop. That's something I need to know! So, this goes into my "check-it-out-when-you-get-some-TIME" file!

Read more!

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Year of Fog Photos

I've just read about a great-sounding book, and discovered an interesting set of photos that complements it. Michelle Richmond wrote The Year of Fog, and Robert has a Flickr slideshow that nicely complements it. Views of SF are interspersed with views of fog and foliage. Check it out!


Read more!

Thursday, January 18, 2007

Passionate Eater

Here's a gorgeous blog: Passionate Eater. The photogoraphy is sumptuous, and the menus look delicious. Yumm...eye candy for the soul. I know this is a tough juxtaposition next to my previous post, but - life often appears like this!

Read more!

Saturday, December 02, 2006

Chilling Photograph

Today's Wall Street Journal has a lead article called "A Chilling Photograph's Hidden History", in which the author reveals the name of a photographer, and the details of a photograph's history, that reminds us how important photography is in the Middle East today. I recently completed a research project into the Influence of Photography in the Middle East, and I barely scraped the surface. This story adds so much, both visually and documentarily, about how hard it is to be a photographer under conditions of governmental repression. The fact that Jahangir Razmi took photographs at all, is as remarkable as the fact that he made such significant photos, and that he had to keep hidden just who he was.


Unfortunately, you will not be allowed to VIEW this image, unless you were fortunate, or foolish, enough to subscribe to WSJ's online edition. See the link that's provided to the public. I guess this is America's answer to the Islamic/Iranian/absolutist's prohibition against viewing dangerous photos. Unless you are willing to pay your masters in the coinage of the realm (here it's dollars, there and then it was often your life), you are forbidden, and this image's history will STAY hidden. If you want to read more, check out this link for "see related article". What a racket. In fact, this is precisely why I refuse to subscribe to WSJ, though I did give them this one final try. My airline offered me the chance to subscribe for 3 months (at the cost of hundreds of airline "miles"), and I took that opportunity. Now, I see it's just a solicitation for more money, and an enticement for ill-gotten gains. Surely the WSJ can be more availing with "their" news, and less stingy with society's glue. Without the images photographers take, and the stories reporters make, there is no Wall Street Journal. And without viewers like you, and readers like me, there is no WSJ. So - I await the next American revolution, when we realize that education and information belong to all, and that hoarding and hostaging is against our public morals. Shame on you, WSJ.

OK - there's hope here: the author, Joshua Prager, has a little information about the story and the photograph. Is this akin to Razmi hanging on to the contact sheets until it's safe to show them? That is, until WSJ has the decency to reveal the sources of THEIR stories, we'll have to be grateful to individuals like Prager that refuse to shut up, or be shut out...

For posterity's sake, here's a link to Prager's story: A Chilling Photograph

Read more!

Tuesday, November 14, 2006

Photography in the Middle East

I have decided to explore the issue of photography in the Middle East for my second research paper in the class on the History of the Middle East that I'm taking from Foothill College. This online class, taught by Dr. D. Davison, has a requirement for two papers. The first one was on an Islamic relgious figure. I chose to write about Moulay Idriss., the patron saint of Morocco and founding father of the Idrissids, one of the many dynasties in the Islamic/Arabic empires.

For this second paper, we are supposed to choose a topic regarding the impact of Western culture on the Middle East. It may seem strange that I have chosen a topic as seemingly innocuous as "photography", when there are far more suitable subjects available. After all, the primary impact of the West on the East was undoubtedly political, and only secondarily social and cultural. Nevertheless, I hypothesize that I will find that the field of photography has had significant impact on the Middle East. At least, that will be my premise, and I hope to find out just what that impact has been.

The Islamic faith is famous for its proscription against graven images. The fear, of course, was that they would deter the faithful from revering God, or Allah. This prohibition has been so strong, even in recent times, that any religious figures have been destroyed (think of the Taliban in Afghanistan), and all art has focused on non-human forms or subject matter. A secondary concern, no doubt, was the danger of disturbing the allegiance to the caliph or sultan or shah that served Allah, protecting the faith and policing the faithful. This synergy between the religious leader and the political head of state was unique to Islam, and explains in part both its strength and its weakness, as a cultural institution.

At first glance, photography seems as if it could not be further from the real needs and wishes of the Arabic, Turkish, Persian, and Egyptian Islamic empires we have read about, nor would it seem to be acceptable to the multitudes of dispersed Muslim communities that now number over 1.2 billion (see LexicOrient or Answers for more information). So - what in fact is the history of photography in the Middle East? When was it introduced to the Middle East; how was it handled; what was its impact? These will be some of the questions I will pursue in the process of writing about "Photography in the Middle East". So, if you're interested, as I am, in these issues, come back in a couple weeks, and read what I've discovered!

Read more!

Saturday, October 21, 2006

Patterns

Here's another get website: Patterns. It's a slide show of photos by Ian McAllister that reflect the patterns of life: natural, and social/human. What a wonderful idea!

I learned about this photo album from "Comet", the monthly e-newsletter from Lonely Planet. The article I saw talked about the problem of storing photos while traveling. Many respondents talked about the iPod solution, which is what I discovered and used for our recent trip to Europe. Every night I would download my photos from the SD card onto my 60 gig video iPod (a wonderful birthday present from a fabulous partner). I had moments of trepidation many times when the iPod was insufficiently charged, a problem for which I eventually figured out the solution. However, I lost narry a photo, and when I got back home I could download all of them to the computer for further processing.

Unfortunately - that's where they lie now! As my father the economist describes it - there's no COST to creating digital photos, so that one can easily do as I did: take 500 photos/day. There IS a cost, however. As I've discovered, that cost is in the form of time. I just don't have the TIME to revisit all my photos - to editorially manage them, to identify and name them, and to upload them to the web.

Furthermore, I've finally admitted I have a defective camera. Almost ALL of my Pentax Optio 550 photos are too dark! That means that I have to manually lighten them, and otherwise color-correct them. What a drag! After 3 years, I've finally figured out the solution: when taking photos, I need to add .3 or .7 EV - I'm not quite sure what that means, but it seems to solve the problem. Meanwhile, I'm left with this TON of unprocessed images. Sigh. To further complicate the matter, I keep signing up for new classes at Foothill, so I have ever-decreasing amounts of available time for the project. What I'm hoping is that I will, through time, develop the skills and knowledge to efficiently approach this backlog of images. Meanwhile, I'll enjoy the efforts of others, such as this fine album of Patterns.

Read more!

Thursday, October 19, 2006

Photo Blog

Here's a link to Harlan's Blog. Also, check out his photo site. I love his opening photo! Harlan is in my COIN 74 class at Foothill - we're learning to use Dreamweaver (a web management tool). And that's what I'm supposed to be studying right now!

Oops - I went back and found a different entry photo. Oh well, that one's good too. But the one I really liked was the pile of newspapers - a GREAT shot!

Read more!

Thursday, October 05, 2006

PhotoBlog

I came across a really great photo blog today: Frederic Larson's Mystical Photography, at the San Francisco Chronicle's website, SF Gate. I've never seen an actual "photoblog" before, and in a way I was a little diappointed. I expected that...more great photos, and discussion, and STUFF would show up. Instead, just one beautiful picture appears, with a link to past photos. Down below the image are links to categories of photographs, and comments, and a brief blurb about the photographer. Frederic Larson has worked for the Chronicle for more than 25 years as a photojournalist, but this blog says it's his "intimate photos of nature...that have captivated readers for years." I can see why! I first came across Larson's work while reading an article about "Railway Renegades" (see "News Photos" and "Color vs. Black and White") in the Chronicle a few months ago. I learned then that he teaches classes at City College in SF. Maybe someday I'll actually meet him! In the meanwhile, I'll simply enjoy his work. In fact, I think I'll put a link on my blog to his blog, so I can check it out more often...

The photo I especially liked, taken at the Westfield San Francisco Center opening, was posted October 2: "It's a Bird..." The photo has all the beauty of my favorite photographer's images - but I can't even remember his name! Well, when it comes to me I'll add to this... Anyway, I like the simplicity and organic beauty of this simple view of the dome. The fact that an aerialist hangs from the top is almost incidental to the dimensionality of the photo, yet adds interest (once it was pointed out - I didn't notice it, and wouldn't have had any idea what it was without the description comments). I have to say, THIS is the kind of photographer I like to have doing the jornalistic tasks of showing us the world as it's lived today. Amongst the chaos which must have ensued at the great new mall's emergence, this man found an image of beauty. His photograph has a simplicity, beauty, and resonance that reminds one of nature's own. Thank You.

Read more!

Sunday, September 17, 2006

Art and the Park



We spent an interesting morning at San Francisco's DeYoung Museum. The main attraction was the Gee's Bend Quilts. However, just as intriguing to me was the exhibit called Chicano, with an art collection by Cheech and Patti Marin.
The fact that today's weather was beautiful, and that we got to walk through the Golden Gate Park, made the outing all the more enjoyable.

Read more!

Friday, August 11, 2006

COIN 82 Final

Well, I made it. It's 10 minutes to 12, and all my classwork is completed. See my final project at: COIN 82 Final. Now, it's time for a well-earned adieu. I've learned a lot, but now it's time to sleep on it!

Read more!

Lab10-Interactivity



slices and rolloversimage map
Lab 10 Assignment

Challenge: help me figure out why one image aligns to the bottom, and the other to the top! Both images are coded with valign="top", yet only one does so. Such are the vagaries of html...

Well, we're almost to the end of the quarter. This assignment, which can be seen at Lab 10-Interactivity, was a definite challenge. We had to learn how to slice images into smaller sections, and to create links to outside websites. In addition, we created an image map which creates "hot spots" in sections of an image that are linked to outside web-sites. In spite of the difficulty of understanding and following instructions in this assignment, I think it will prove one of the most useful exercises yet. I'll let you know...

Read more!

Thursday, August 10, 2006

Animations


Click here
to see animated image

Lab #9 for COIN 82, Images for the Web, was FUN! We had several exercises in animation, and the surprise was in following the instructions, and then being joyfully surprised with what resulted. I used my animation as an introduction to a family web site for my mom. Check it out at Marian's Meadows.

Read more!

Transparent Art


Transparencies pose a particular challenge to the web designer. I don't pretend to have fully understood what we learned in class. However, I do know a lot more than when I began this chapter! During this lab assignment we faced the challenges of creating &/or using jpg and gif images, including vignettes, line art, and multi-colored backgrounds. Our assignment was to make optimize these images for the web, and in some cases to either remove them from their background, or to put them in a new background.

To see more from this assigment, check out my COIN 82 web site: Lab 08 - Transparencies.

Read more!

Tuesday, August 01, 2006

Type and Fonts

Here's a link that shows what the various type faces look like!

Read more!

Monday, July 31, 2006

Web Navigation


This week's lesson focused on web navigation - making the layout for web pages using the tools of Photoshop. The first part of the assignment was to create a navigational system using the colors and instructions provided.

The second part was to redesign a web page's navigational structure.

And the third part was to creat an image that could be used as a background tile, and then to lighten it enough so that text could be placed on top.




Read more!

Friday, July 28, 2006

File Compression

The assignment due tonight was to evaluate 5 images and to determine how they can best be compressed. Compression of images for the web is an all-important topic. Both the style and the quality of the compression determines how fast the images download, and hence how user-friendly is the website. It does no good to have quality images if they take so long to access that no one sees them! That being said, I must admit that this is my weakest skill in photography. Well, almost...

The problem I had for this assignment is that my "eye" is not that good! I really couldn't tell the qualitative differences between compressing a jpg photo at quality-60 vs. quality-70, or compressing a gif file with selective vs. adaptive reduction. I found this exercise excrutiating. Even when I enlarged images 200%, I couldn't always tell whether A or B was the better choice (kind of reminds me of the difficulty of the eye doctor's exam...).

As I said, this is my weakest photographic skill - almost. That's because the whole arena of color-correcting a photo is another difficulty, and it's just as, or even more, critical. What this essentially means is that my visual skills are not all that great! Sigh. It's a sad thing to have to admit, but there it is. What I have going for me, in the field of photography, is more than anything my interest and my eagerness. With that, I keep trying to get better photos, and to improve my editing skills. But I've also discovered that it's great to have a live-in editor! What I don't see may be obvious to my partner, and that really helps a lot.

Meanwhile, I'll continue taking classes and learning about photo editing - and hope that someone else will do it!

Here's a link to the images we evaluated.

Read more!

Tuesday, July 25, 2006

Depth of Field

Here's a useful looking tool - a depth of field calculator.

Read more!

Monday, July 24, 2006

Web Photo Gallery

The assignment for Lab 5 of "Images for the Web" was to create a photo gallery using Photoshop's tools for automation. Mine is part of a long-range plan to post online selected photos from our recent Summer Road Trip 2006.

Check it out and let me know what you think!

Read more!

Saturday, July 22, 2006

Photoshop Slideshow

I found a GREAT example of making a slideshow using Photoshop: Postal Museum Slideshow. I like the layout, the color, the size of the images - and, to top it off, the images themselves!

Read more!

Friday, July 21, 2006

Tutorials

I came across some good links for Photoshop tutorials that I'd like to share. Here's one on Photoshop Tools. Here's the site from where I found it: Photoshop Lab.

I also came across a really cool podcast: Terry White's Adobe Creative Suite Podcast. Here's a blog reference to that podcast: WebLogs Inc. And,here's a link to the Unofficial Photoshop Blog.

Please feel free to suggest any other photography tutorial sites, including blogs, podcasts, and other instructional presentations. Probably the easiest way is to simply add a comment to this posting. Otherwise email me...

Read more!

Thursday, July 20, 2006

Image Preparation


The assignment for Lab 4 was to color correct and sharpen 3 images (taken by Instructor Andrea Massalski), to resize the images to be 200 pixels wide, give them a 5-pixel black border, put the images onto a Layout page, and then add a copyright to our work. Above you see my results!

This assignment was a lot more challenging than I expected. I still feel awkward with the layers principle used by Photoshop. Basically what happens is that every element on this image (such as each area of text, each individual photo, the bar of color at the bottom, and even the copyright) is on a different layer. This allows you to make changes to each layer separately, and to go back and forth between different layers. However, it's an awkward way to work if you're not used to it!

Anyway - that's what this whole class is all about - learning new techniques and getting used to them. As you can imagine, I'm expecting this process to have big pay-off for me as we work on the photos I took on our European vacation this year. Hopefully I'll have some of these photos to show soon...

Read more!

Monday, July 17, 2006

Something to Show


Finally, I have something to show for my work in Images for the Web!

It seems like it's taken me a long time to get anything worth seeing - the labs for the first two weeks weren't very interesting, but I think this 3rd assignment is. Check out my homework at: Martha's COIN 82.

By the way, the images and design are from our instructor, Andrea Massalski. We had to make adjustments to the images, and add them to the layout we created last week. My rendition still has a few errors (the brown lines are too short, and too close to the edge), and I'll hopefully correct them soon. Nevertheless, I am proud of my accomplishment. It was NOT an easy chore!! The hardest part was transferring the clouds from one photo into the village photo, which had no sky to speak of.

Here's the instructor's version
:

Read more!

Monday, July 03, 2006

COIN 82 class begins

Today I started a new class online at Foothill College. It's called "Images for the Web", taught by Andrea Massalski. COIN 82 (Images for the Web) is a class I've considered taking several times, so I'm really looking forward to finally getting the chance. Besides, I've got LOTS of photos from our recent vacation... We drove cross country to Kansas, and then down to Texas. From Houston, we flew to Europe, and spent a wonderful 2 weeks touring by bus through 10 countries. Then, after another week visiting family in TX, we drove back to SF via Interstate 10. Since our return, we've spent hours analyzing and editing our photos, and preparing to put some of them on the web. I'm hoping this class gives me the tools to maximize the beauty and accessibility of these photos. Hope you enjoy the results!

Read more!

Thursday, March 30, 2006

Color vs. Black-and-White


In finding the reference to my last blog posting, I discovered that the original photograph, taken by Frederic Larson in 1998, was in color! What a difference!! Yet, is it?

I have to admit, I like BOTH versions of this photograph. The color version shows us the sky, in a way that was not very visible in the black-and-white version. Also, we get the strong red lines mixing with the gray and white in the blanket. And we see the siding is a mottled, sandy-mud brown. Still, the boys stand out in their dark jackets. Maybe the roundness of the bedroll is a little more prominent. Other than that, it's not much different. Except for the sky. Yes, that definitely changes the picture. The sky makes the image altogether more hopeful, more positive; the boys feel safer here in a world where the sky is blue. Indeed, they ARE safe, in this rolling home-away-from-home. Transients they may be, but the edginess of their life is no longer so evident.

Hmm - maybe there's something to this black-and-white thing. It's as if the loss of color lets us look in on the view in a totally different manner. We concentrate on the essence, rather than being seduced by the eye-candy of color. Well, I'm still debating: Should I try taking more photos in black-and-white? It feels like such a LOSS to me. But when I see evidence like this, it makes me wonder. Isn't it at least worth exploring?

Read more!

News Photos



Going through last week's SF Chronicle newspapers (prior to the arrival of the recycling service), I came across this photo from Sunday's paper (3/26/06). Taken in 1998 by Frederic Larson/The Chronicle, it's used to illustrate a news article called "Railway Renegades" - I'll try to post a link here. What struck me, more than the article itself, is the photo - it is a fantastic shot! It's got so much power packed into it, no wonder this 1998 photo is used to illustrate an article in 2006 - it is still relevant!


Why is it a great photo? There's a lot of empty space on the upper left; there's a lot of weight on the lower right - it's unbalanced! And nothing's happenening!! Yet that's just the point. A LOT is happening in this photo, and it's certainly worth the viewing.

One guy is trying to sleep, perhaps. He's got his bed roll and a blanket - must be cold. Another guy's taking a drag on a cigarette; baseball hat turned backwards, hooded sweatshirt, gloved hand with fingers free - he's Mr. Cool. The third guy looks up - what does he see? His brow is furrowed, his hair upright in the air. The perspective is a longshot of the railcar - the siding, rods in the train bed, the bedroll - all take the eye upwards. To what? Emptiness. An electrical wire; an outdoor lighting fixture; a blocky white building that contrasts with the gray surroundings. The youths all look in different directions: the sleeper's gaze is down to the lower left; the smoker's is down and inward; the bigger boy's gaze in the back is up, right, and to the outside. What a shot!

Adrift in the world, precariously-perched on a heap of metal rods, these boys are indeed riding the rails. The tagline says "Homeless young adults ride a freight train in Oakland heading for Phoenix in the late 1990s. Once the fading province of hoboes, riding free in a freight car has undergone a revival for everyone from immigrants to middle-class thrill-seekers." Is that what they are? What IS their story? Where's the interview eight years later? What are these guys doing now?

As photographers, it's so easy to capture a quick one, and so hard to make a great one. But do we really "get the story"? The story, for these guys, was certainly not over in the space of the second it took to snap their photo. And it will not be over even if we know their whereabouts today. In fact, this story is not even about them. Too bad - I'd like to know more. And what about the phtographer? What became of him? What's HIS life story? An image that opens doors - that's what this is. It raises questions, and interests the eye. What more can one ask?

One final note: why is it that the corporation owns the individual's artwork? It just doesn't make sense to me. No matter who's employ we're in, the work is still ours. At least they give Frederic Larson credit. Still, I object to the way our legal system is letting the corporations conspire to take over individual effort and community creativity. We are turning into a state of serfs once more.

Read more!

Thursday, March 23, 2006

Evans 1936 Greensboro AL


"Greensboro Alabama" is from Getty's Walker Evans: Before + After Exhibit ("© 2001 The J. Paul Getty Trust. All rights reserved."), and is used for educational purposes only.

This photograph called "Greensboro Alalbama", taken by Walker Evans in 1936, is in marked contrast to "Main Street, Saratoga Springs, New York". The view of Greensboro is particularized, with the people and signs giving it a specific look. In contrast, Main Street, Saratoga Springs (see below) is generic. To me, it seems to transcend time and location, and thus reaches the spiritual level.


This is not to say the Greensboro photo is any less worthy! However, it IS a distinctly different TYPE of photo, taken for a different purpose, and having a different effect, at least on this viewer (see my class essay "Evaluating Art - Main Street). I'm curious, does anyone else have any other reactions to share about these two images?


Read more!

Evans 1931 "Main Street"


See my article Evaluating Art-Main Street for an essay written for Foothill College's course in History of Photography, taught Winter 2006 by Kate Jordahl.

Read more!

Evaluating Art - Main Street

Walker Evan's 1931 photo called "Main Street, Saratoga Springs, New York" continues to haunt me. Why? It's as if there's something THERE, but I can't put my finger on it. Why does this photograph speak to me? Why does it call me? Most of all, why does it haunt me? There is something uncomfortably insistent about this image of a rainy day, with barren trees, and rows and rows of seemingly self-replicated cars. What is it about this photo that impresses me, and why do I feel so uncomfortable with that impression?

This photo would absolutely fail, I think, were it reproduced in color. There is something so satisfying about seeing the gradations of black and white, and the similarity of tones is such a satisfying complement to the unity of what's seen - rows and rows of cars, limbs and trunks of trees, luminescence of rain on the pavement that glistens and guides our eye through and around the photo.

Truly, this is a black and white world, a world of the interplay of line and light, of texture and tone. The sheer GRACEFULNESS of the image is overwhelming! The way every object is cleanly delineated, the way lines lead the eye up, down, and around, the way the rain glistens - all these add up to an image that energizes as it soothes, and that satisfies as it upsets.

Why do I say the image upsets me? It seems to be too simple! It is of nothing - a bunch of cars, some barren trees, a wet walkway. So what, I want to shout! What makes THIS image so great?

And great it is. Not because the photo historians call it so - indeed, I have never even SEEN this photo classified as "great". Oops, the very image I gaze at tells me this is not so. There beneath the title and identifying description are Kate's words about Walker Evans: "His sense of composition and space are unparalled. His work both commercial and documentary rings with truth and vision."

So - I am not alone in seeing this image as awesome. But still, I'm left wondering - what does that mean? What is compostion? A sense of space? What is truth and vision?

When I first viewed this photo (2/6/06), I looked online (2/11/06) to see what was so special about Saratoga Springs. That is - why is the location of the street, the town, and the state given such prominence in the naming of this photograph? And what does it matter? Let's see...

Saratoga County was "the fruitful hunting ground of the Iroquois Indians". The word from which Saratoga comes, "Sarachtogue", means "hillside of a great river." The website on History in Saratoga County continues by saying Indian trails crossed the County in all directions due to "its favorable position in the angle of the Hudson and Mohawk Rivers." Fur trading was a part of the economy, and mineral springs were used as medicine. In 1777, Saratoga was the site of "the first significant American military victory during the Revolution," and "the Battles of Saratoga rank among the most decisive battles in world history."

Lumber was the source of the next economic boom, followed by the establishment of mills for the tanning industry and for water power. The mineral springs brought international fame to the county as people such as Daniel Webster, Martin Van Buren, Washington Irving, Andrew Jackson, and Franklin Pierce came to visit. Such people as "Vanderbilts, Whitneys, Rockefellers, J.P. Morgan, "Diamond Jim" Brady, Lillian Russell and others added glamour to the County."

With the influx of the wealthy came their popular pasttime - horse racing, in 1863. In the 1930s came "gamblers, gangsters, bookies, pimps and prostitutes." Edna Ferber's "Saratoga Trunk" immortalized the city's name.

A map of Saratoga Springs shows the trown's street names - Broadway, Church, Washington, Lake, Union, Crescent, Geyser, West - where's Main Street, I wonder?

Maybe that's the point. In Walker Evan's image of "Main Street, Saratoga Springs, New York," none of this matters! (Compare it with this image.) There is no evidence of Indians or fur, nor of racetracks or spas. In fact, all of humanity seems absent from this sight save for the evidences they've left behind - automobiles, sidewalks, and buildings. In the midst of this city street stand tall, slender, elegant trees, undressed yet open to the elements. The limbs reach up or gracefully bow sideways, and some even droop low. These trees seem to stand sentry for a world that is long gone. The animals the Indians hunted are gone; the native Americans themselves are gone; the lumber industry is absent; the glorious past is not present. All that exists are the artifacts of civilization, the black, regimentally lined-up automobiles.. Without any drivers. Where are all the people? Do they live in these houses? Do they work in those buildings? Where is the bustling activity that should accompany this scene?

It's as if the rain were weeping. Weeping for a past that is forgotten, and for a present that is forlorn. The interplay between nature and culture is laid out before our eyes. The rain glistens, the trees glorify, the sky covers all. Stairsteps lead to nowhere, activity is empty, only life is left to bloom - and only in it's proper time. This photograph is of the end of an era - the end of the growing season, the end of a majestic town, the end even of a world view.

Yet it is also a deeply spiritual image. In spite of the substance, the cars and the buildings and the pavings over earth - there is still life. This is, indeed, a "Still Life", worthy of the masters. Evans photo is a masterpiece because it pulls all these elements together, all these innuendos and illusions/allusions, and it let's us see, and leads us to feel, something that's worthy. In the end, we are soothed by this scene - life goes on. It may be hidden from view; it may appear artificial, or regimented, or monotonous; it may feel barren. But hinted at nevertheless is the source of new life - the light, the rain, the limbs all tell us that life lives on. It lifts us up and away from the mundane, and lets us view the heavens above. In the end, Evans lets us celebrate this moment together - this realization that civilization is omnipresent, but it is not omniscient. The elements of nature are necessary to letting us live the life of elegance and productivity we so long for. The majesty of the sidewalk cannot match the bounty of the tree. Evans reminds us here, lest we forget. What a view. What a vision. Complete.


Read more!

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

Snapshots of Dorothea

Lessons Learned from Lange

As we wind down this class, I have completed a series of papers and presentations about Dorothea Lange, the photographer I chose for the "Longer Essay" assignment of our class. This portion of my presentation tells about Dorothea in a series of "lessons" I've learned from reading about her life. She was an extraordinary photographer, and I think that so much more now that I know more about her.

You can see my entire presentation by clicking on this link: Final Project, and you can see the web page with links to ALL my assignments by clicking this link: Martha's Phot10 Assignments. It's been an interesting quarter, and I've learned a lot about photography, about myself, about finding one's passion, and putting it to purpose. I hope you've enjoyed my assignments, and I hope to continue writing here from time to time, as I share more of Martha's "Photographic Views".

To read my paper called "Snapshots of Dorothea", click "Read More!":

Stand Up for Yourself

Dorothea Lange learned at an early age that it’s important to stand up for your self. Her mother wanted her to be a school teacher, as her aunt had been. It was a good career for a woman, and it could have suited her abilities. Yet she knew that wasn’t for her. In fact, she announced to her mother one day while still in high school that she intended to be a photographer! It was astonishing, because she had never taken a photograph, and didn’t even own a camera.

The career she chose really seemed to have chosen her. She noticed stories in the newspapers about Martha Graham, the dancer. One powerful image accompanying these articles stayed with her. As she walked along the streets of Manhattan one day, she saw that photograph in a display window. She walked into the shop to learn more about the photo, and met the maker of it. The studio owner was Arnold Genthe, a photographer made famous by his photographs of the 1906 earthquake in San Francisco. His portrait studio on Fifth Avenue catered to wealthy clientele. Dorothea began frequenting his studio, and eventually worked for him. He even gave her a camera, her first! He encouraged her to take classes in photography, and she took one class at Columbia University with Clarence White, the great Pictorialist photographer. All in all, it seems a serendipitous beginning for one who would produce one of America’s most prominent images. Migrant Mother became “undoubtedly the most popular image created during the Depression era”[1], and it moved a nation to respond to the plight of agricultural workers left without money for even a meal.

Take a Chance

Dorothea enrolled in the New York Training School for Teachers, as her mother advised, but she continued to dream of another life. One day, an itinerant photographer came to her family’s house, and offered to make inexpensive family photographs. In talking with him, she found that he didn’t even have a dark room. She offered him use of the empty chicken coop in the backyard, and together they cleaned it up and set up a processing studio. Soon, she was developing photographs on her own.

Widen Your Horizons

Once Dorothea had the knowledge she needed to make a career as a portrait photographer, she was ready to create her own studio. Yet Hoboken, New Jersey, where she was born (May 25, 1895), would not do. She talked to a friend she’d met in high school, and together they created a plan to travel around the world. At age 22, in 1918, they set out across the country, and got as far as San Francisco. When her friend Fronzie was robbed of all the money they had saved, they had to get jobs to support themselves. Dorothea got a job working in the photofinishing department of a downtown store. On her very first day at work, Dorothea met Roi Partridge. Partridge, an etcher, was also the husband of photographer Imogen Cunningham. These three, and their families, grew to be lifelong friends, as well as artistic companions. Eventually Dorothea also met a man who was willing to give her the money needed to set up her own studio. After only six months in San Francisco, Dorothea Lange set up her own portrait studio on Sutter Street.

Get Connected

Dorothea met her future husband, Maynard Dixon, at her portrait studio. She was fascinated by him, by “his sharp wit, his rich, detailed stories, and his ability to draw anything…”[2] Regardless of the age difference, (Maynard was 45, and she was only 24), Dorothea once again took a chance, and on March 21, 1920, they married. Two boys soon made the family complete. By now, Dorothea’s days were filled with homemaking and housekeeping, and left little time for photography. On one of their trips to the Southwest (where Maynard painted in his characteristic Western style), Dorothea Lange saw the photographer Paul Strand walk by. She realized then how much harder it was for a woman to be a photographer. He was free to work at his studio, while she had to care for a husband and children.

Make the Tough Decisions

Maynard and Dorothea separated in the early 1930s. Dorothea knew she had to have more freedom to do what she wanted and needed to do. And together, she and Maynard were quarreling too much, and co-operating not enough. The boys, aged 7 and 4, were sent to boarding school, and friends were told they were “saving money”. It was a tough decision, but one both partners knew they had to take. Dorothea moved into the room above her studio, and spent her time making portraits of people who could still afford to pay for them.

Follow Your Instincts

Photographing wealthy clients, as Arnold Genthe had done, came easy to her, and she was successful at it. However, she eventually longed for more. And she was troubled by what she saw outside her window. America was in the Depression, and she often saw “hungry, homeless men wandering forlornly along the sidewalks.”[3] One day, she felt driven to photograph what she was seeing outside her window. She took her camera, and walked outside, down to Market Street, towards the soup kitchen run by a woman called the White Angel. The photograph she took there, called White Angel Bread Line, continued to haunt her. She posted it on her walls, and looked at it in the ensuing days. When wealthy clients asked what she was doing with that photograph, she said she didn’t know. But it continued to call her to take her camera into the streets. More and more, she found herself going out after photographs, and her work began to take a whole new direction.

Find Your Niche

Maynard and Dorothea made another attempt at living together, and rented a house on Gough Street. When Dorothea needed time for herself, she sent the boys to stay with friends. During the summer of 1934, the family went to Fallen Leaf Lake, taking Ron and Pad Partridge, the twin sons of Roi Partridge and Imogen Cunningham. Dorothea tried photographing the nature around her. Her friend Ansel Adams was so successful doing that, but Dorothea was not satisfied with her results. One day, she realized that this wasn’t for her – she needed to photograph people! “…it came to me that what I had to do was to take pictures and concentrate upon people, only people, all kinds of people, people who paid me and people who didn’t.”[4]

Follow Your Passion

Dorothea’s photographs, meanwhile, were being exhibited in a small gallery in Oakland. Paul Taylor, an agricultural economics professor at the University of California in Berkeley, saw them and was quite moved. He called her up and asked if he could use one of her photographs in an article he had written. He also asked if she would accompany him to photograph one of the self-help cooperatives he was studying. Dorothea was delighted. She, Imogen Cunningham, and several other photographers joined Paul for two days photographing the families in a site 125 miles north. Once again, Dorothea allowed a chance encounter to determine the direction of her life. She admired Paul, and the way he worked, and what he believed in. “Dorothea learned about Paul’s belief – that weaving each individual story together with all the other stories would clarify the larger issues America was struggling with.”[5]

When Paul got a part-time job with the federally-funded State Emergency Relief Administration (SERA), he managed to hire Dorothea (as a typist!) to photograph the migrant laborers coming to California. “The Taylor-Lange reports were powerfully written, and illustrated with compelling photographs.” Based on these reports, $20,000 was transferred from another fund to SERA to establish the first two emergency California migrant camps, with “toilets, hot showers, stoves, tent platforms, a small building for the office manager, and a large community building.” Finally, Dorothea had found a way to marry her photographic abilities with her empathetic feelings for people, and to fit them together for a PURPOSE

Replant, and Prosper

Roy Stryker, the head of the Resettlement Administration in Washington DC (later renamed the Farm Security Administration) saw the Taylor-Lange reports, and was impressed. “Stryker found Dorothea’s work so revealing he put her on his payroll in August 1935. She joined Arthur Rothstein and Ben Shahn as a staff photographer. The FSA photographers over the next few years included Margaret Bourke-White, Walker Evans, and Russell Lee. From 1935 through 1943, they photographed across America, compiling more than 270,000 photographs.”[6]

Meanwhile, Dorothea’s divorce from Maynard became final in November, and Paul and Dorothea married on December 6, 1935. They rented a house in Berkeley big enough for five children: Dorothea’s two sons (Dan, 10, and John, 7) and Paul’s three children (Katherine, 13, Ross, 10, and Margot, 6). Dorothea was regarded as a tough disciplinarian at home, but an excellent cook, and a capable manager of the household. And the couple was deeply in love, and uniquely well-suited.

In 1935, Rondal Partridge, now seventeen-years-old, began to assist Dorothea in her photo shoots. Paul couldn’t always accompany her, due to his teaching schedule, and she needed help with the heavy equipment and the driving. Once again, Dorothea profited from the chance encounter years earlier with Ron’s father Roi, and she took the opportunity to connect with people in a deep and lasting fashion. Ron Partridge is the father of Elizabeth Partridge, who wrote Restless Spirit, an excellent biography full of family photos of Dorothea. Elizabeth also wrote the accompanying text for an insightful film produced by her sister Meg called A Visual Life. Thus, the families of Imogen Cunningham and Dorothea Lange have spent decades working and creating together, and we are all their beneficiaries.

GET THE PICTURE!

One time, Dorothea was driving home alone after a long and tiring month in the field. Late in the day, she passed a sign announcing “Pea Pickers’ Camp”. She was too tired for one more photo, and continued driving. “Twenty miles later, almost without realizing what she was doing, she made a U-turn and headed back to the camp. ‘I was following instinct, not reason. I drove into that wet and soggy camp and parked my car like a homing pigeon.’”[7] Inside the camp she found a family in a lean-to, a mother with her 4 children. Dorothea found that the freezing rain and sleet had ruined the pea crop, and that the family had just sold their tires to get money for food. She took six photographs in all, moving closer each time. In the final photograph, Dorothea asked the children to turn away from the camera, fearing their faces would detract from the image. The baby is partially hidden, and the mother gazes off into the distance. Her forehead is furrowed, and her face is forlorn, yet the dignity and determination of the American spirit in a time of despair is plain to see. The image itself is a masterpiece, an incredible photograph that expresses all that the Depression came to mean.

The next morning, Dorothea immediately developed the photograph, and hurried with a copy to the San Francisco News office. “Haunted by what she had seen at the pea pickers camp, she knew she needed to act immediately.”[8] The photograph was printed March 10, and picked up immediately by the wire services. “The response to the newspaper article was instantaneous and powerful. Seeing the desperate, helpless mother unable to feed her children shocked Americans nationwide. They were appalled that the very people who provided food for American families were themselves starving. The federal government acted immediately, shipping twenty thousand pounds of food to the California fields. Dorothea felt a flood of relief and satisfaction that she had helped the starving pea pickers. But she had no way of knowing then that Migrant Mother would become her most famous image, reproduced thousands of times all over the world. To many, it came to symbolize the despair and uncertainty of the Great Depression.”[9]

Keep Growing, and Create!

“Dorothea continued as a photographer until her death in 1965, crisscrossing America, and later the world, with her camera.” She photographed the “Second Gold Rush” in the Bay Area, when thousands flocked to the shipyards of Richmond during World War II. She made compassionate and critically-expressive photographs of the internment of Japanese-Americans during that war, photographs the government hid for decades. She photographed country people, and Irish people, and children, and produced books that showed others what she saw.

Following the war, however, Dorothea’s photography was limited for almost 10 years by long-term illnesses and surgeries. “Despite her stomach pain, Dorothea was determined to make a record of the tremendous social changes going on around her. ‘You can’t deny what you must do, no matter what it costs. And with me it was always expenditure to the last ditch. I know the last ditch. I’ve lived on the last ditch.’”[10] Dorothea had other losses and grief during these years. Maynard Dixon died in 1946, at the age of 71, and her son Dan returned from the war to live on the streets, homeless, dirty, and angry. When he finally returned home feverish and forlorn, she helped him rebuild his life. Eventually, he wrote an article on Dorothea, and published it, becoming over time a freelance writer. Good times came again for the Taylor-Lange family, as marriages and births and college and careers took over their daily lives.

Dorothea began shooting photographs, in her sixties, with a 35 mm camera, instead of the heavier camera she’d used for so many years. She reorganized her collection of negatives, “throwing out the ‘mountains of photographic trash.’”[11]. And she moved in new directions, photographically. “Going over all her work, Dorothea found that her focus was shifting. Earlier, she had photographed people in relation to harsh, powerful events like the Great Depression, the dust bowl, and World War II. Now she was trying to get at something else. She wanted to show people in relation to people, to see what they meant to one another and to themselves. There are ‘things you have to look very hard to see,’ said Dorothea, ‘because they have been taken for granted not only by our eyes, but often by our hearts as well.’”[12]

Practice and Profit from Partnership

Beginning in 1958, Dorothea accompanied her husband Paul, who began consulting work overseas. She went to Japan, to Ecuador, and to Egypt, photographing wherever they went. Even after an episode of malaria, and her diagnosis of cancer, Dorothea continued to focus on her work. Her last days were spent preparing a showcasing of her photographs put on by the Museum of Modern Art (MOMA) in New York City curated by John Szarkowski. It was difficult for her to do so, for “She knew that choosing her best photographs and putting them up on the museum walls would be baring her soul for the world to see.”[13] She and John fought constantly for which photos should be in the show, and which should not. And the results paid off: “Together they put together a show that was stronger than either could have done alone.”

CONCLUSION

Dorothea Lange once remarked to a friend, “To live a visual life is an enormous undertaking. I’ve only touched it, just touched it.” Well, thank goodness for that, for in doing so she has touched the lives of so many. As a child, Dorothea Lange suffered polio at age seven and the abandonment of her father when she was twelve. Rather than allow these two circumstances to crush her spirit, or harden her voice, or cloud her vision, she made of her life a masterpiece. In the process, she has given all of us a model of an artist’s life. She has, herself, become iconic, just as her Migrant Mother, for just as her photographs reach us at the human level, her life shows us who we are, and what we’re made of. I salute Dorothea Lange, then, the artist, as much as I do her photographs, for she has given us a clear and concise recipe for what needs to be done. Like the good cook she was, her life produced a nutritious and soulfully-delicious feast for those of us who strive to see, and to be.

[1] Photography, a Cultural History, by Mary Warner Marien, Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002, p. 285.

[2] Restless Spirit, The Life and Work of Dorothea Lange, by Elizabeth Partridge, Penguin Putnam, New York, NY, 1998, p. 27.

[3] Ibid, p.39

[4] Ibid, p. 48

[5] Ibid.

[6] Ibid, p. 55

[7] Ibid, p. 2

[8] Ibid, p. 5

[9] Ibid.

[10] Ibid, p. 94

[11] Ibid, p. 98

[12] Ibid.

[13] Ibid, 107


Read more!

A Visual Feast

I am finished with the reading of our text for the “History of Photography” course I’m taking through Foothill College online. Mary Warner Marien’s Photography: a Cultural History(1) provides a veritable visual feast of images along with instructions on how to consume them. The kaleidoscope of imaginative images that I first experienced as overwhelming (see “I am already overwhelmed”) has turned into a sumptuous banquet that delights the senses and soothes the soul. Once I learned how to modulate my episodes of exposure, I was able to savor each tidbit without gorging or gagging. This was quite a feat! Marien presents image after arresting image in a cornucopia fashion that was initially very frustrating. It was too much to take in! It was impossible to digest and to incorporate. Finally, I simply closed the book, and waited. In fact, I think I took a whole month’s vacation from reading the text! Now I’m back, and I have finished with the reading of it. And, I’m ready to critique it.

I have been fascinated by photos for as long as I can remember. My father was a photographer in his early years, and my mother faithfully re-produced his voluminous outpouring of images in albums that I treasure. My most memorable image of my father as photographer is when we were on vacation. Dad was not uncommonly covered with a black-and-white camera on the right shoulder, a color-film-camera on his left shoulder, and holding a movie camera in between. As kids, we often had to pose for not one, not two, but perhaps THREE re-enactments of episodes on our travels. At family celebrations, such as Christmas or Thanksgiving or Easter, we had to sit through the elaborate process of setting up the flood lamps before we could eat our meal or open our presents. When family guests came for dinner, we often as not finished the meal with a trek to the living room to view Dad’s latest version of slides or movies. In other words, photography for me is an integral part of our family’s daily life. And I loved it!

As a professor of agricultural economics, Dad often as not had a purpose to many of his photographs that eluded us. In fact, we were often as not thoroughly unappreciative. “Not another butcher’s shop!” we pleaded in Italy. “Don’t you already have a million pictures of the corn fields of Kansas?” we asked as we stopped one more time by the side of the road as Dad made a carefully-constructed record of how the crops are doing this year, in this place, at this time. Little did he know that this would come back to haunt him, in a most peculiar fashion. I, the daughter, have turned into a caricature of his artistic and professional pursuits. He calls me the paparazzi. He groans when I appear with my camera, and he grimaces with every photograph of him that I take. He is NOT amused! He is irritated by this constant pursuit of images, this obsessive wish to record life’s little moments. And he is most annoyed by the interference with mealtime! When the table’s set, and the company is seated, he’s ready to get on with the REAL business at hand! He does NOT want to pose for another picture!!!!

In light of this, it is a real joy and inspiration to read Marien’s tour-de-force that evaluates photography, and places it in the scheme of things. After all, I need some philosophical ammo with which to defend myself! I cannot face my father’s wrath and his squirms and glowering without an ideological point of view. And she has given me one. Rather, she’s given me dozens. Just as my mother Marian is so often the mediator in our family, so can Mary Warner Marien serve as a mediating force between my father and me. For Marien shows that photography has a long and variegated history. It is not all-of-one-thing. There is as much room in this world for the professionals, like my father, as for the amateurs, like me. In the history book of life, we will all get a chapter, or a paragraph, or at least some prose or a verse. Furthermore, one photographer can not be seen without seeing afterimages of another. Bill Owens’ images of Suburbia hearken back to the “visual sociology of the F.S.A. photographs” which he admired(2). Edward Steichen’s The Family of Man, which thoroughly entranced me growing up, was totally trounced by many photographers and critics. And ordinary images such as Parents by Wang Jinsong’s 1998 production of composite pictures(3), can have extraordinary meanings (and that word is purposefully plural!).

In other words, it’s ok that my father hates the work that I do, and the way that I do it! And it’s ok that I am an irritant to others in my pursuit of an oftentimes unknown (to me) or unknowable (to you) purpose. When all is said and done, photography IS. It IS part of our lives in the 21st Century, and it IS as varied and as virtuous or not as we make it. Therefore, I can gain genuine substance from this feast of images, and this densely-packed panorama of visual delights. I can be sustained by it as I strive to match the masters, and I can be supported by it as I withstand the onslaughts of others. To be a photographer is anyone’s right, and to follow one’s way is everyone’s duty.

Alas, I cannot say that my father will fare so well. His daughter is now armed with intellectual armor that will enable her to withstand his barbs, and to overlook his scowls. For now I know that the photographer-that-I-am is as legitimate as any other. I can’t explain why I want to photograph every inch of my father’s house, every relic of my mother’s boudoir, and every instance of our family’s interactions. All I can say is this: it is IN me to DO so! I have been born and bred a photographer, just as much as I am a writer. I have been fed a diet of images, and seen a surfeit of situations in which photography is IMPORTANT. It’s not just the big events that deserve to be memorialized. It’s the littlest detail that may matter years down the road. As I sit and leaf through the albums my mother so carefully constructed for each of her three children, I marvel at what a precious gift it is. From my father the photographer and my mother the collator and critic, the mediator and the memorializer, they have given this gift to me. I have a handle on my past that many would die for. I have a tool for my daily doings that gives me purpose and pleasure. And I have a passion for the future that no college degree or corporate job or socially-sanctioned lifestyle could ever match. I may be just a snap-shot shooter, but I’m a photographer, nonetheless. And that’s what counts. For long after my parents pass away, I will have their images, and their genealogy, and their letters and recipes and WHATNOT, from which I, their daughter, can make sense of the world they’ve given to me. And I thank them, with every photograph that I take. I thank them, with every effort I make. For I not only give them a digitalized life, but I enliven the life they’ve given to me. Amen.

1. Photography, a Cultural History, by Mary Warner Marien, Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002
2. Ibid, 358
3. Ibid, 447

Written: March 19, 2006




Read more!

Saturday, March 18, 2006

Oliver Stone’s Salvador

Oliver Stone’s 1985 movie “Salvador” ostensibly tells the story of a man, a country, and a milieu. Yet it also tells a story of the medium of photography, and of the photographer’s relationships to his subjects, his co-workers, and to himself. In the end, it shows the growth of an individual (photographer Richard Boyle, played by actor James Woods), the death of a photographer (John Cassady, played by John Savage) and the destruction of a country (El Salvador). In all, it is a devastating critique of a society that destroyed any semblance of what we may want to think of as civilization. Nothing is pleasant about this movie. The language is gritty, and the scenes are gruesome. The characters are conniving, callous, or caustic. The story is depressing beyond belief. Director Oliver Stone pulls no punches when he exposes us to the madness and mania of this era and its evidences. Yet in the end, it is a movie well worth the viewing, and an experience expansive in its meanings.

The special effects section of the DVD includes an extra feature called “Into the Valley of Death”, a 2001 video by Charles Kiselyak about the making of the movie “Salvador”. Kiselyak includes extensive interviews with James Woods, Oliver Stone, Richard Boyle, and former US ambassador Robert White. It is a wonderful addition to the main video, for it augments our understanding of Richard Boyle, the photographer, and it further exposes the intricate relationships between artists and their objects of art (their subjects). The video “Salvador” depends on the relationships forged between the actors, the originator, and the director. Also, it is affected by the meta-relationship with the country and the finances of film-making. Kiselyak does a good job of adding dimensionality to Woods and Stone, in particular. We get a real appreciation of what it’s like to work so intimately on something that is ultimately so devastating. It was NOT an easy “shoot”! Thus, everything about this video release shows that art is WORK, and that to make it work, one must give every ounce of dedication and discipline one can muster.

Boyle, the photographer who’s the ostensible subject of “Salvador”, is not a man one would choose to embrace. He is crass, crude, and disgusting. Yet maybe it is just this type of individual, totally removed from his milieu and at a distance from his subjects, who is most willing to go to the places more “normal and nice” photographers shun. It is said, in both of the videos on the Special Edition DVD I saw, that Boyle was the last photographer out of Cambodia. And he persisted in Vietnam when others baled. To knowingly walk into chaos, let alone “Into the Valley of Death” is insanity to most of us. Yet the field of photography depends on just this form of madness, and on a mania to “get the picture” – and, on the will to survive. The differing fates of Boyle and Cassidy (who died while getting his shot) are emblematic of the photographic dilemma – someone must survive to tell the story, yet someone (and maybe it’s someone else), must be willing to die for it. In both cases, the focus needs to be on the photograph – and on the story one wants to, or needs to, tell.

Oliver Stone makes the point that “Salvador” means “savior” in Spanish. The title of the country, El Salvador, was intentionally not chosen for this film. The implication, I think, is that this movie is about far more than a country, or an era, or a way of life. It is about salvation, about the need for salvation, and about the people who deliver it, and the process of finding or acquiring it. James Woods as Boyle finds salvation in the love of a woman, and the loss of her brother. He becomes “humanized” to the horror he is going through as a witness, and he becomes a participant. He ceases to care about earning a living as a photographer, or about the truth of his American marriage, or about being truthful itself. He confesses to a priest, to marry Maria, to get a cedula, to get her out of the country. He becomes, or tries to become, her savior. Alas, his efforts fail. Ronald Reagan’s American government has failed to recognize the thousands who fled El Salvador as refugees, and sends her back. The horror of her being returned to El Salvador becomes, for us, experiential dynamite, for we have gained awareness, through the film, that our own government is complicit. Ronald Reagan’s government both funded the militia that marauded and murdered, under the guise of fighting communism, and it then refused to accommodate the thousands who fled. We failed to be a savior when one was sorely needed.

There is another level of salvation that also occurs through this movie. The end credits, I believe (or perhaps it is the secondary video by Kiselyak), tell us that the making and showing of the movie “Salvador” was instrumental in forcing the American government to reverse it’s policy of turning away the Salvadorian refugees. In this sense, photography provides the saving grace. Photographs, and this video, visualized an event that was incredible and hence non-believable to others without seeing it. Richard Boyle, in spite of his asinine attitudes, saved the day by BEING there. John Cassady, of course made the ultimate sacrifice for this story to be told. Oliver Stone coincidentally salvaged Boyle’s story from the back seat of Richard’s beaten-up, run-down, jalopy, at a time when Richard’s efforts had reached a dead-end. And James Woods gives such a telling portrayal of Boyle, and what he went through, that we are mesmerized by this story, and its significance. All told, this story IS about “Salvador”. It is about the persistence of human nature against any adversity, and about the integrity of an artist to his craft; about the folly of photographers, and the stupidity of societies, about love and war and want. Ultimately, it is about us. It reaches into our recesses, where we want to do the right thing, and to not walk away. Boyle reached that point, as did Oliver, and Woods, and even Ambassador White. We must be engaged and allow ourselves to be captured, just as much as our subjects are, if we want to make photographs of value. And we must be willing to wade through the muck, and hold onto the illusory, if we want to survive. Photography, for some of us, provides such a way. And photographers, such as those shown here, can light the way.

ONLINE REVIEWS:

Plot Summary by Tony Bowden: “A journalist, down on his luck in the US, drives to El Salvador to chronicle the events of the 1980 military dictatorship, including the assassination of Archbishop Oscar Romero. He forms an uneasy alliance with both guerillas in the countryside who want him to get pictures out to the US press, and the right-wing military, who want him to bring them photographs of the rebels. Meanwhile he has to find a way of protecting his Salvadorian girlfriend and getting her out of the country.” http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091886/plotsummary

Another Review from Video Universe: “A harrowing account of the experiences of American combat photojournalist Richard Boyle during the bloody El Salvador civil war of the early 1980s, SALVADOR marked Oliver Stone's emergence as a director with a passion for social and political issues. James Woods stars as the reckless Boyle, who takes off for Central America with his friend Dr. Rock (Jim Belushi) as the war heats up, fully equipped with pharmaceutical enhancements. As the range and magnitude of the carnage become increasingly apparent and the extent of the Reagan administration's involvement revealed, Boyle begins to sober up both literally and physically.

Oliver Stone's first overtly political film, SALVADOR is a passionate protest against the savagery unleashed by fascist thugs in El Salvador during the early 1980s with the complicity of the U.S. government. It stars James Woods as combat photojournalist Richard Boyle, an erratic, cynical character with a taste for all things chemical. Hearing rumors of war, he and Dr. Rock (Jim Belushi), another free spirit, head for El Salvador by car. After viewing a right-wing officer's collection of severed ears and photographing a corpse-strewn garbage dump with ace photographer John Cassady (John Savage), Boyle realizes that the situation is much worse than advertised in the American press. He recognizes familiar faces among the ubiquitous U.S. military brass and CIA personnel from his stint in Vietnam, but they're predictably reluctant to discuss the reasons for their presence, especially with the outrageous Boyle. As the journalist becomes involved with a Salvadoran native named Maria (Elpedia Carrillo) and observes the selfless dedication of his humanitarian worker friend Cathy (Cindy Gibb), compassion and outrage slowly begin to replace his cynicism. When Boyle swears to the dying Cassady that he'll get his crucial photos out of the country, he realizes that he must also try to get Maria out before she too becomes a statistic. Woods gives a brilliantly incendiary seriocomic performance in this wild, lacerating, and bitterly observant film.

Shot in Mexico. Shown at the Santa Barbara International Film Festival February 28, 1985. James Woods's confession scene was entirely improvised. John Doe of the band X makes a cameo appearance as a restaurant owner. He later would play the owner of the Crashdown restaurant in the television series ROSWELL.” http://www.cduniverse.com/productinfo.asp?pid=1655041

OTHER LINKS:
New York Times Review:
http://movies2.nytimes.com/gst/movies/movie.html?v_id=42687

http://lilt.ilstu.edu/smexpos/cinergia/salvador.htm
This link identifies Newsweek photographer John Hoagland as a photographer who was killed in El Salvador, and shows some of his photos, including his last six.

Review by Dawn Taylor on The DVD Journal:
http://www.dvdjournal.com/reviews/s/salvador.shtml

Review by Johnny Web: http://www.scoopy.com/salvador.htm

DVD Savant Review: http://www.dvdtalk.com/dvdsavant/s265salvador.html

DVD Movie Guide Review: http://dvdmg.com/salvador.shtml

Read more!